Bio-LogicBio-Logic Science Instruments Authorized Distributor for Türkiye
+90 (312) 437 40 77  ·  [email protected]
TR/EN
Get a Quote
Popular topics · Corrosion and local techniques (LEIS, SVET)

Why does a low-conductivity electrolyte give better images in SVET and LEIS?

Both techniques measure the potential gradient above the sample, and this gradient is inversely proportional to electrolyte conductivity. Comparative SVET and LEIS maps in tap water and dilute NaCl.

Key points

  • For a point source the potential at the probe is φ = I/(2πκR), where κ is the solution conductivity and R the distance from the source. As conductivity increases the gradient and the signal weaken; simulations show that low conductivity also improves the localisation of features.
  • If a high-conductivity electrolyte must be used, the signal can be increased by moving the probe closer to the sample, although this is not always possible.
  • Conductivity is assumed constant throughout the measurements; evaporation increases it and leaves the calibration valid only at the start. A large-volume cell such as the TriCell is a simple precaution.
  • In LEIS conductivity also affects the usable frequency range: low conductivity improves the resolution of the ac current, high conductivity reduces the effect of stray capacitance at high frequency.
  • Conductivity can be determined from the ohmic resistance fitted from EIS instead of a conductivity meter.
  • Examples: SVET in tap water (145 µS/cm) and 5 mM NaCl (590 µS/cm); LEIS at 134 µS/cm and 655 µS/cm. At low conductivity the signal is stronger and the contrast clearer.

Figures

(a) SVET and (b) LEIS probes measuring the equipotential lines above the sample; the signal comes from this gradient.
Figure 1. (a) SVET and (b) LEIS probes measuring the equipotential lines above the sample; the signal comes from this gradient.
SVET map of the same point source: in tap water (145 µS/cm) the signal is strong and broad, in 5 mM NaCl (590 µS/cm) weak.
Figure 2. SVET map of the same point source: in tap water (145 µS/cm) the signal is strong and broad, in 5 mM NaCl (590 µS/cm) weak.
LEIS map: local impedance contrast is clearer at low conductivity (134 µS/cm) than at higher conductivity (655 µS/cm).
Figure 3. LEIS map: local impedance contrast is clearer at low conductivity (134 µS/cm) than at higher conductivity (655 µS/cm).

Images: Bio-Logic Science Instruments; taken from the source article.

Related application notes

Related curriculum module: Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS)

Related products:M470
Source: Bio-Logic Learning Center, “Better image resolution in SVET and LEIS using low conductivity electrolyte” · Source updated: May 27, 2025
Copyright of the images and the original text belongs to Bio-Logic SAS.

All popular topics

Would you like to set up this measurement in your laboratory?

Contact our technical team for the suitable instrument, cell and software configuration.

Quotation and technical consulting